Medicine

Length weight relationship and body composition of male population of Oreochromis mossambica in relation to body size and condition factor

Authors

  • Muhammad Usman

    Department of Zoology, University of Lahore, Sargodha Campus, Pakistan
    Author
  • Naila Amjad

    Department of Zoology, University of Lahore, Sargodha Campus, Pakistan
    Author
  • Faiza parveen

    Department of Zoology, University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Pakistan
    Author
  • Shoaib Hassan

    Institute of Zoology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan-60800, Pakistan
    Author
  • Humaira Zulfiqar Ali Gondal

    Department of Zoology, University of Lahore, Sargodha Campus, Pakistan
    Author
  • Ayesha Allahyar

    Department of Zoology, University of Baluchistan, Pakistan
    Author
  • Fatima Rashid

    Department of Zoology, University of Lahore, Sargodha Campus, Pakistan
    Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71107/kx19gt96

Keywords:

Fish, Morphometry, Oreochromis, Mossambica, Weight-Length

Abstract

Oreochromis mossambica is sampled from Nursery Unit, Muzffargarh, and Punjab, Pakistan with help of a drag net. Sample having 42 males with size range 13.2-16.6 cm and body weight range 44-95.22 gm. The samples are selected for analysis of external morphometry. There is positive correlation between wet weight and condition factor (r = 0.185). It has highly significant correlation with standard length (r = 0.908), head length (r = 0.808), body girth (r = 748), pectoral fin length (r = 0.698), pelvic fin length (r = 0.708), anal fin base (0.636) and caudal fin length (r = 566). All factors have positive correlation with wet body weight. Highly significant correlation is present between total length and wet body weight (r = 0.955) with standard length (r = 0.934), head length (r = 0.797), body girth (r = 0.669) and anal fin base (r = 643). Similarly, total length has positive correlations with dorsal fin length, dorsal fin base, pectoral fin base, pelvic fin base, anal fin length and caudal fin base. Total length shows inverse correlation with condition factor (r = 0.095).  It also has positive correlation with other external morphometric factors. Log total length has highly significant positive correlations with log body weight (r = 0.958), log standard length (0.930), log head length (r = 0.804), log body girth (r = 0.686), log pectoral fin base (r = 682), log pelvic length (r = 730), anal fin base (r = 0.634) and caudal fin base (r = 636). It has inverse correlation with the condition factor (r = 0.080). 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Muhammad Usman, Department of Zoology, University of Lahore, Sargodha Campus, Pakistan

    Department of Zoology, University of Lahore, Sargodha Campus, Pakistan

  • Naila Amjad, Department of Zoology, University of Lahore, Sargodha Campus, Pakistan

    Department of Zoology, University of Lahore, Sargodha Campus, Pakistan

  • Faiza parveen, Department of Zoology, University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Pakistan

    Department of Zoology, University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Pakistan

  • Shoaib Hassan, Institute of Zoology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan-60800, Pakistan

    Institute of Zoology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan-60800, Pakistan

  • Humaira Zulfiqar Ali Gondal, Department of Zoology, University of Lahore, Sargodha Campus, Pakistan

    Department of Zoology, University of Lahore, Sargodha Campus, Pakistan

  • Ayesha Allahyar, Department of Zoology, University of Baluchistan, Pakistan

    Department of Zoology, University of Baluchistan, Pakistan

  • Fatima Rashid, Department of Zoology, University of Lahore, Sargodha Campus, Pakistan

    Department of Zoology, University of Lahore, Sargodha Campus, Pakistan

References

1. Webster, M. (2006). Introduction to geometric morphometrics. Department of the Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago.

2. Nacua, S. S., Dorado, E. L., Torres, M. A. J., & Demayo, C. G. (2010). Body shape variation between two populations of the white goby, Glossogobius giuris (Hamilton and Buchanan). Research Journal of Fisheries and Hydrobiology, 5, 44–51.

3. Bannikov, A. F., & Tyler, J. C. (2008). A new genus and species of triggerfish from the middle Eocene of the northern Caucasus, the earliest member of the Blaistidae (Tetraodontiformes). Paleontological Journal, 42(6), 615–620. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0031030108060075

4. Jabeen, N., Hussain, A., Ahmad, I., & Ali, J. (2025). MXenes-based hybrid for electrochemical sensing application. In MXenes as Emerging Modalities for Environmental and Sensing Applications (pp. 203-215). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-21853-8.00012-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-21853-8.00012-8

5. Froese, R. (2006). Cube law, condition factor and weight–length relationships: History, meta-analysis and recommendations. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 22, 241–253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0426.2006.00805.x

6. Bagenal, T. B., & Tesch, F. W. (1978). Age and growth. In T. Bagenal (Ed.), Methods for assessment of fish production in freshwater (3rd ed., pp. 101–136). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Scientific Publications.

7. Wootton, R. J. (1990). Ecology of teleost fishes. Chapman & Hall. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0829-1

8. Martin, W. R. (1949). The mechanics of environmental control of body form in fishes. Ontario Fisheries Research Laboratory, 58, 1–91.

9. Jhingran, A. G. (1968). The length-weight relationship and K factor of Gudusia chapra (Hamilton) from the Ganga river system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India, 38, 3–4.

10. Salam, A., Chatta, Q. U., Zaman, Q. A., Akhtar, S., & Khan, S. (1994). Weight–length and condition factor relationship of a freshwater hatchery-reared rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss from Swat, Pakistan. Acta Scientiarum, 4, 67–72.

11. Salam, A., Ali, M., & Anas, M. (2001). Body composition of Oreochromis mossambicus in relation to body size and condition factor. Pakistan Journal of Science, 12(1), 89–96.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-17

How to Cite

Length weight relationship and body composition of male population of Oreochromis mossambica in relation to body size and condition factor. (2025). Conclusions in Medicine, 1(1), 13-17. https://doi.org/10.71107/kx19gt96